Deadline
May 11, 2026
SMART Antiviral Prize Expands to $150M – Meet the 9 Concept Stage Winners →
Join an Upcoming Info Session →
The SMART Antiviral Prize is focused on identifying safe and effective broad-spectrum small molecules that have the potential to advance into clinical trials and achieve U.S. regulatory approval. The goal of this competition is to advance the development of novel antivirals that strengthen the therapeutic pipeline and address gaps in strategic preparedness in partnership with innovators offering creative solutions.
Deadline
May 11, 2026
The SMART Antiviral Prize focuses on supporting the development of antivirals with broad-spectrum activity against members of the Togaviridae and/or Flaviviridae families.
There are currently no FDA-approved broad-spectrum antivirals for any viruses within these families—which include dengue, Zika, West Nile, and chikungunya. These viruses collectively cause millions of infections each year, including increasing numbers of cases in the United States.
CLOSED
No longer accepting applications.
Now with Increased Funding!
Opens Early 2028
Opens Early 2030
The Stage 1: Hit-to-Lead application period for the SMART Antiviral Prize is now open.
We are seeking innovators developing next-generation broad-spectrum antiviral approaches. Stage 1 will support teams advancing promising antiviral candidates through early optimization and validation milestones. Target Compound Profile, Scientific Eligibility Criteria, and Evaluation Process & Criteria are available below. To view frequently asked questions and resources, go to FAQs & Program Guidance.
The SMART Antiviral Prize has outlined a set of target criteria for potential entrants to reach. View this document for more information.
The SMART Antiviral Prize sets scientific eligibility criteria covering target virus, modality, and mechanism of action. View this document for the full Stage 1 requirements.
This document outlines the Evaluation Process & Evaluation Criteria for Stage 1: Hit-to-Lead.
Submit your Declaration of Intent to determine your eligibility to participate in the SMART Antiviral Prize.
Note: DOI will be published in September 2026.
Submit your Declaration of Intent to determine your eligibility to participate in the SMART Antiviral Prize.
The SMART Antiviral Prize is more than a competition – it’s a call to advance bold ideas and move promising science forward.
Participation in the SMART Antiviral Prize is subject to official Terms & Conditions.
The SMART Antiviral Prize is focused on identifying safe and effective broad-spectrum small molecules that have the potential to advance into clinical trials and achieve U.S. regulatory approval. The goal of this competition is to advance the development of novel antivirals that strengthen the therapeutic pipeline and address gaps in strategic preparedness in partnership with innovators offering creative solutions.
The SMART Antiviral Prize is a multi-stage competition designed to move candidates from idea to IND readiness through clear, stage-specific milestones and published evaluation criteria. It consists of a Concept Stage that prioritizes a well-defined technical and development approach (not extensive data), with later stages requiring progressively deeper technical submissions and evidence of broad-spectrum activity and product attributes—while allowing multiple entry points as candidates advance.
If you or your organization would like to explore collaborations with other innovators for potential joint collaborative applications, please visit the SMART Antiviral Prize Teaming Page.
Have questions about the SMART Antiviral Prize? Join one of our upcoming info sessions to learn more about the challenge, the application process, and what we’re looking for. You’ll also have the opportunity to engage directly with the VITAL team during a live Q&A.
Do you have capabilities in running live-virus, cell-based antiviral potency assays for Dengue and Chikungunya and are interested in serving as a reference facility for the SMART Antiviral Prize?
All information provided within is preliminary and subject to change. Specific criteria and requirements are currently being refined. In the event of any inconsistency, the official SMART Antiviral Prize Terms & Conditions supersede this information.
Describe development plans to discover or advance broad-spectrum small molecule antivirals for Flaviviridae and/or Togaviridae families.
Identify at least one promising chemical series with reproducible cell-based antiviral activity and an early SAR that supports rational optimization.
Build an initial “go/no-go” dataset for each series—basic ADME/PK, key developability flags, and early safety/DDI triage—to justify moving into lead optimization.
Optimize potency, selectivity, and exposure to produce a well-characterized lead and backup, with a clear plan to mitigate remaining liabilities.
Demonstrate in vivo proof-of-concept efficacy in a relevant animal model and nominate an IND candidate (and backup where feasible) suitable for IND-enabling studies.
Complete the nonclinical package required for first-in-human dosing, including GLP toxicology/safety pharmacology and definitive ADME/DDI studies, plus manufacturing/CMC readiness (quality, stability, and formulation appropriate for clinical use).
Conduct appropriate FDA interactions and assemble an IND-ready submission package suitable for filing to initiate clinical trials.
The SMART Antiviral Prize offers multiple awards to support innovators across four progressive stages – from early concept through IND readiness. Each stage builds upon prior success, rewarding the most promising candidates for achieving ambitious yet attainable milestones on an accelerated timeline.
Up to 7 – up to $7.5M each
Opens September 2026
Up to $42M
Up to four – up to $10.5M each
Anticipated Early 2028
TBD
At least two
Anticipated Early 2030
$22.5M
Nine – $2.5M each
Closed May 11, 2026
Meet the Concept Stage Awardees here.
The SMART Antiviral Prize fosters the growth of innovators by funding early-stage development. Some prizes in Stages 1 and 2 are reserved for Concept Stage winners who meet success criteria. Teams meeting eligibility criteria may participate at any stage without having entered past stages.
Awards for Stage 1: Hit-to-Lead
Up to seven (7) awards are anticipated for Stage 1, three (3) of which are reserved for Concept Stage winners. The remaining four (4) awards are available to both Concept Stage prize winners and new entrants.
*Two-Success Criteria Tracks: Data packages may be submitted against one of two success criteria: Optimal Success Criteria or Essential Success Criteria, as defined in the Target Compound Profile.
Reserved Awards for Concept Stage Winners: The three reserved awards are available only to eligible Concept Stage winners and may be earned at any time during the submission window. These reserved awards will be issued to the first three Concept Stage winners whose data packages meet the Optimal Success Criteria. If less than three of the Concept Stage winners meet the Optimal Success Criteria, any remaining reserved awards will be issued to the Concept Stage winners who meet the Essential Success Criteria during the submission window using the same first-to-finish approach. Any reserved awards not earned by Concept Stage winners by the end of the submission period will be released and made available to other eligible Stage 1 submissions. Such awards will first be made available to qualifying Optimal Track submissions and, only after all qualifying Optimal Track submissions have been considered, to qualifying Essential Track submissions.
Declaration of Intent submissions open for teams entering Stage 1: Hit-to-Lead. Approved entrants become eligible to submit data packages.
Data package submission window opens for Stage 1: Hit-to-Lead.
The Declaration of Intent window closes.
Final deadline for Stage 1: Hit-to-Lead data package submissions.
Up to eight awards will be made after a merit-based review of all proposals. Submissions will be reviewed as a batch after the solicitation period is closed. Applications will be accepted starting in early February 2026. Concept Stage award decisions are anticipated in Q3 2026. The evaluation process and accompanying criteria are outlined below.
Up to six awards will be made in total. Up to two (2) of the six awards are reserved exclusively for Concept Stage winners that meet the Optimal or Essential Success Criteria within the specified submission window.*All applicants must submit a Declaration of Intent and receive approval before their submissions can be reviewed.
Data packages may be submitted at any time during the submission window (anticipated to open in early 2027). Submissions will be reviewed in the order received, and awards will be made on a first-to-finish basis, subject to validation of the data.
The two reserved awards are available only to eligible Concept Stage winners and may be earned at any time during the submission window. These reserved awards will be issued to the first two Concept Stage winners whose data packages meet the Optimal Success Criteria. If none of the Concept Stage winners meet the Optimal Success Criteria, the reserved awards will be issued to the first two Concept Stage winners to meet the Essential Success Criteria during the submission window.
Data packages may be submitted against one of two success criteria: Optimal Success Criteria or Essential Success Criteria, as defined in the Target Compound Profile.
Optimal track:
Awards for Optimal submissions will be made on a rolling basis as soon as the data are reviewed and validated, until all available prizes for Stage 1 (that have not been reserved for Concept Stage winners) are awarded.
Essential track:
Submissions that meet only the Essential Success Criteria will be held and considered at the end of the submission period. Essential awards will be made only if funding remains after all Optimal awards have been issued.
Data packages may be submitted at any time during the submission window (anticipated to open in early 2027). Submissions will be reviewed in the order received, and awards will be made on a first-to-finish basis, subject to validation of the data.
Data packages may be submitted against one of two success criteria: Optimal Success Criteria or Essential Success Criteria, as defined in the Target Compound Profile.
Optimal track:
Awards for Optimal submissions will be made on a rolling basis as soon as the data are reviewed and validated, until all available prizes for Stage 1 (that have not been reserved for Concept Stage winners) are awarded.
Essential track:
Submissions that meet only the Essential Success Criteria will be held and considered at the end of the submission period. Essential awards will be made only if funding remains after all Optimal awards have been issued.
The two reserved awards are available only to eligible Concept Stage winners and may be earned at any time during the submission window. These reserved awards will be issued to the first two Concept Stage winners whose data packages meet the Optimal Success Criteria. If none of the Concept Stage winners meet the Optimal Success Criteria, the reserved awards will be issued to the first two Concept Stage winners to meet the Essential Success Criteria during the submission window.
Data Packages will be evaluated by a panel of subject matter experts in accordance with the Evaluator Guide. The Evaluator Guide establishes the criteria and the expected level of detail to be provided in the submission. The overall award determination will consider the complete Data Package, including entrant-reported data, and the findings generated by the designated reference laboratory.
The panel of subject matter experts will independently review the complete submission package, including all required data, the appropriateness of the study designs, controls, and analytical approach of studies used to generate those data, plans, supporting documentation, and applicable findings from the designated reference laboratory. The panel will then make binary assessments (yes or no) as to whether the submission meets EACH established TCP criterion. Finally, the reviewer panel will determine whether the complete data package and its assessed TCP criteria, considered as a whole, qualify as a winning entry.
The final award decisions will be made by Start2 Group based on evaluations by the panel of subject matter experts.
The SMART Antiviral Prize has outlined the set of target criteria for eligible entrants to reach by the end of Stage 1. Stage 1 entrants should design a plan with these milestones in mind to address risks and reach the project goals within the data submission period.
All information provided within is preliminary and subject to change. Specific criteria and requirements are currently being refined. In the event of any inconsistency, the official SMART Antiviral Prize Terms & Conditions supersede this information.
This document outlines Desired Product Attributes that entrants may find useful when shaping antiviral concepts for submission to the SMART Antiviral Prize. These attributes are provided as a draft and are subject to change as the prize design is further refined.
iPersistent infections caused by Chikungunya lead to prolonged viral presence (up to 28 days) and may need longer duration of treatment for sustained viral clearance.
The SMART Antiviral Prize has outlined the set of target criteria for eligible entrants to reach by the end of Stage 1. Stage 1 entrants should design a plan with these milestones in mind to address risks and reach the project goals within the data submission period.
All information provided within is preliminary and subject to change. Specific criteria and requirements are currently being refined. In the event of any inconsistency, the official SMART Antiviral Prize Terms & Conditions supersede this information.
BARDA currently supports multiple efforts to develop therapeutics against several biological threats. One consistent limitation in current medical countermeasure (MCM) preparedness efforts is the lack of successful processes and approaches available to improve the early-stage pipeline for small molecule therapeutics. This aspect of MCM preparedness is particularly challenging given that traditional approaches have not worked well for these types of therapeutics.
Therefore, the goal of this effort is to identify new technical approaches that can address this critical gap in preparedness. Under this effort, approaches are sought that can produce new, safe, and effective small molecules active against a broad range of viruses within one or more viral families. The SMART Antiviral Prize is composed of four stages, with success in the final stage culminating in an IND-ready candidate prepared to progress to Phase I clinical trials.
We seek to award new innovators and new breakthrough approaches, while encouraging participation from both traditional and non-traditional innovators in order to expand the pool of creative and feasible solutions. The goals of the SMART Antiviral Prize are to address gaps in the current pipeline of therapeutics that can advance into the clinic, as well as identify promising approaches to small molecule development that could be rapidly applied to future threats.
As outlined in the Program Overview and Scientific Scope section, BARDA recognizes the importance of broad-spectrum small molecule antiviral approaches that strengthen the therapeutic pipeline and address critical preparedness gaps. The prize competition model encourages participation from both traditional and non-traditional innovators, expanding the pool of creative and feasible solutions.
For a detailed description of the eligibility criteria, including viral families of interest, therapeutic modality, mechanism of action, development stage and treatment approach, see the Scientific Eligibility Criteria.
The SMART Antiviral Prize is limited to traditional small molecule drugs—organic compounds with a molecular weight at or below 900 Daltons that can be chemically synthesized or isolated from natural sources (e.g., plants, animals, minerals). The following are not permitted: biologics (including peptide-based products and antibody–drug conjugates) and nucleic acid-based drugs. Nucleotide and nucleoside analogs are allowed and considered traditional small molecule drugs for the purposes of this prize competition.
Proposed antivirals must directly target highly conserved viral factors (direct-acting antivirals) or proviral host factors required for viral entry, replication, or persistence (indirect-acting antivirals). Products without measurable antiviral activity will not be considered. “Measurable antiviral activity” refers to demonstrated inhibition of viral replication or reduction in viral load in relevant in vitro and in vivo models. Products that act solely through immunomodulatory or symptomatic mechanisms without directly impacting the viral lifecycle will not be considered.
No. Compounds that have been tested in humans at any stage of clinical development (Phase I–IV) are not eligible for this prize. This includes FDA-approved drugs, repurposed clinical-stage compounds, and reformulations of approved or previously clinical-stage drugs. Chemical derivatives of such would be eligible if they are New Chemical Entities, with substantive molecular modification beyond reformulation, and applicants must demonstrate appropriate freedom to operate (FTO) when leveraging proprietary compounds as starting points.
Developers with more advanced products are encouraged to review open solicitations to identify potential alternative opportunities to apply for BARDA funding.
The SMART Antiviral Prize focuses on identifying antivirals with broad-spectrum activity against the Togaviridae and/or Flaviviridae families.
Both viral families are prioritized by the Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE) due to their potential to emerge as novel, high-consequence pathogens capable of causing a U.S. public health emergency. In addition, these viral families were selected based on alignment with BARDA’s published Emerging Infectious Diseases (EID) strategy (Johnson et al. 2025) and prioritization frameworks (White et al. 2025; White et al. 2025). Specifically, BARDA’s prioritization framework emphasizes factors such as public health impact, outbreak size and frequency, technical feasibility of development, and readiness of countermeasure approval pathways.
No. Preclinical results are expected to be confirmed using live, non-attenuated viruses or strains, which may include BSL-3 and/or select agents. BSL-4 viruses or strains will not be required due to facility access limitations.
The antiviral candidate should be suitable for treatment of acute, laboratory-confirmed infection caused by viruses within the Flaviviridae and/or Togaviridae families.
The SMART Antiviral Prize is intended to advance orally deliverable antiviral candidates toward the clinic. At the Concept Stage, entrants are not required to provide oral exposure or dosing data. However, the development plan should describe how the candidate could be advanced toward oral administration, including any work needed to improve oral bioavailability and related properties. Feasibility data supporting oral exposure and dosing are expected in later stages of the prize. Refer to the Desired Products Attributes for additional information.
No, combination therapy is out of scope and will be ineligible.
Yes. Applicants may apply to the Concept Stage even if their molecule has not yet been specifically tested against togaviruses or flaviviruses, provided they otherwise meet the applicable eligibility requirements for the prize. Applicants should review the eligibility criteria carefully and ensure their submission aligns with all Concept Stage requirements.
The Primary Entrant must be a U.S.-based Concern at the time the Declaration of Intent is submitted and remain a U.S.-based Concern through the issuance of prize awards.
“U.S.-based Concern” means: (i) incorporated in the United States (including a U.S.-incorporated subsidiary even if the parent is foreign based), or (ii) unincorporated with its principal place of business in the United States. Principal place of business is defined as the primary location where management directs, controls, or coordinates the entity’s activities.
Note: Components of the work may be performed by a team consisting of subcontractors, consultants, CROs, or partner organizations, however, the Primary Entrant must retain responsibility for substantively leading the technical effort.
See Terms and Conditions for full details about entrant eligibility.
See the Scientific Eligibility Criteria for scientific scope and eligibility requirements. There is no minimum Technology Readiness Level requirement.
No. Stage 1 is open to previous entrants, previous prize winners, and new entrants. However, entrants must meet eligibility criteria for the stage and submit and receive approval of a Declaration of Intent.
Yes. An entrant may enter or re-enter the prize competition at any subsequent stage, provided they meet the eligibility criteria for that stage. For Stages 1–3, entrants must also submit and receive approval of a Declaration of Intent to be eligible for prize awards.
The primary applicant/award recipient must be a U.S. based concern. Foreign subcontractors and teaming partners may be included, provided they comply with the eligibility requirements. See the Terms and Conditions.
A Declaration of Intent (DOI) is required to participate in Stage 1 and will be used to preliminarily assess entrant eligibility and whether the entrant’s proposed approach falls within the scope of the competition. Prior to submitting a DOI, entrants should review the Scientific Eligibility Criteria and Terms and Conditions to check whether they meet eligibility requirements.
Entrants are encouraged to submit a DOI as soon as possible, as the estimated time for review is up to one month. DOI approval is required to:
The approval of a DOI is not a technical endorsement of the candidate, nor a confirmation that Stage 1 TCP criteria have been met. Entrants may not resubmit a DOI that is rejected for a particular solution.
Prospective entrants are required to submit a Declaration of Intent (DOI) during the DOI submission window, from September 1, 2026 to November 1, 2027. Entrants with an approved DOI are eligible to request an optional pre-submission method suitability call. Once the DOI is approved, entrants will be eligible to submit a data package to the Optimal or Essential track during the Data Package Submission Window (March 1, 2027 to February 29, 2028) to be considered for a prize award. All forms for the DOI and final data package submissions are available via the submission portal.
No.
Separate DOIs are required when intended submissions involve different small molecule drugs, viral targets, mechanisms of action, or have other distinct differences which would result in distinct data packages. Up to two DOI submissions are permitted per prospective eligible entrant.
The DOI will be evaluated by a panel of experts to determine its accordance with the Terms and Conditions and the Scientific Eligibility Criteria.
Entrants will be informed of the status of their DOI (approved or not approved), by email, approximately one month after submission of the DOI. No additional feedback will be provided to entrants beyond approved / not approved.
Entrants with an approved DOI are entitled to submit up to two Data Packages for each approved DOI. This means a single DOI covers both an initial Data Package submission and, optionally, a subsequent Data Package submission. An entrant could, for example, submit a subsequent Data Package if desiring to report improved data for the same track (Optimal or Essential) or if submitting a revised package to the alternate track.
Entrants are encouraged to submit a DOI as soon as possible, as the estimated time for review is up to one month. DOI approval is required to:
The approval of a DOI is not a technical endorsement of the candidate, nor a confirmation that Stage 1 TCP criteria have been met. Entrants may not resubmit a DOI that is rejected for a particular solution.
Eligible entrants with an approved Declaration of Intent (DOI) are strongly encouraged to request a pre-submission Method Suitability Review to receive feedback on the acceptability of their methodological approach prior to submitting a Data Package. One follow-up meeting is permitted after the initial Method Suitability Call, for a maximum of two meetings per DOI. An entrant may not request a Method Suitability Call after submitting a Data Package. Requesting a Method Suitability Review is optional.
No part of the pre-submission Method Suitability Review process evaluates an entrant’s data or determines whether the entrant will meet the TCP criteria; all feedback is non-binding and at the entrant’s own risk.
A final submission (i.e., complete Data Package) must satisfy applicable Target Compound Profile (TCP) criteria to qualify for an award and will be evaluated by a panel of subject matter experts in accordance with the Evaluator Guide to determine whether requirements have been met. Requirements differ between the Optimal and Essential tracks, as detailed in the Stage 1 TCP. Key results reported in the final submission will be subject to confirmation by a U.S.-based reference laboratory. The evaluation process for Stage 1 is described in more detail in the Evaluation Process.
VITAL encourages all entrants to strive to achieve the best possible result within the time limit constraints of the Prize. If you have submitted a complete Data Package but continued to work on your solution and would like to submit an updated Data Package, you may submit again. Each entrant may submit a maximum of two (2) Data Packages total under the Essential and/or Optimal tracks per DOI, and you can submit the second Data Package regardless of whether the original has been evaluated. Each Data Package is timestamped upon receipt and does not inherit the timestamp of the first submission. See Prize Details and Evaluation Process for more information.
An entrant may only be selected as the prime awardee for one award per stage. For entrants other than academic institutions, only one award may be made per stage to the same primary entrant. Separate teams, laboratories, business units, or investigators within the same non-academic organization will be treated as a single primary entrant for the purposes of award selection.
A limited exception applies to academic institutions. Multiple submissions from different Principal Investigators (PIs) at the same academic institution may be considered for, and may receive, award in the same stage, even though the institution is the legal entity that would receive and administer the funds, provided that each submission represents a distinct and independent effort. Each such submission must reflect a clearly different scientific approach, separate team, and distinct supporting resources, and must not overlap in personnel, scope, or underlying solution. This exception recognizes that, in academia, the institution is often the legal recipient of funds, while the scientific work may be independently developed and led by different PIs or research groups.
The primary entrant identified in the submission may not be changed after submission. Note the primary entrant must also be a U.S.-based legal entity (such as a non-profit, for-profit, or academic institution). See the Terms and Conditions for details.
The prize is a fixed award provided to competitors who are selected as winners under the competition rules. Unlike a grant or contract, a prize is not a cost-reimbursement mechanism and is not based on direct, indirect, proposed, or incurred costs. It is expected that winners will use the prize funds to support further development and participation in subsequent stages of the competition, subject to the Terms and Conditions.
The application will not be eligible for an award. The reference laboratory provides independent verification of the potency, selectivity, and virus titer reduction criteria it assesses, and those results must meet the applicable Stage 1 success criteria. Passing reference laboratory testing does not guarantee an award; the comprehensive Stage 1 Data Package must also meet the applicable requirements. For additional questions regarding the reference laboratory, please reach out to info@vitalhubhealth.com.
This document outlines Desired Product Attributes that applicants may find useful when shaping antiviral concepts for submission to the SMART Antiviral Prize.
The SMART Antiviral Prize has outlined the set of target criteria for potential applicants to reach by the end of Stage 1. See this document for more information.
Watch the recording to get an overview of the prize vision, scientific scope, and key details for potential applicants. For a deeper dive and the opportunity to ask questions live, we encourage you to join one of our upcoming Info Sessions.
Did you miss the SMART Antiviral Launch Event? No worries – explore the presentation shared at the SMART Antiviral Prize launch, covering the challenge vision, priorities, and scientific scope.
All information provided within is preliminary and subject to change. Specific criteria and requirements are currently being refined. In the event of any inconsistency, the official SMART Antiviral Prize Terms & Conditions supersede this information.
The SMART Antiviral Prize Service Provider Directory connects Stage 1 participants with organizations offering relevant expertise, capabilities, and services in support of broad-spectrum, small molecule antiviral therapy development.
We will soon be opening requests for service provider profiles. If your organization provides services that can support this work, check back shortly for information on how to submit a profile for consideration. Approved providers will be added to the directory, making it easier for participating teams to discover potential partners and collaborators.
The SMART Antiviral Prize is now accepting submissions from service providers interested in being featured in our directory and supporting Stage 1 participants. The directory is designed to help teams identify and connect with organizations offering relevant expertise, capabilities, and services.
If your organization provides services that can support the development of broad-spectrum, small molecule antiviral therapies, we invite you to submit a profile for consideration. Approved providers will be added to the directory, making it easier for participating teams to discover potential partners and collaborators.
Neither VITAL nor BARDA endorses, sponsors, recommends, or evaluates the qualifications, capabilities, products, or services of individuals or organizations included in the directory. Inclusion in the directory does not indicate that a provider, service, assay, or methodology has been reviewed or determined to satisfy SMART Antiviral Prize requirements.
Entrants remain responsible for determining whether proposed services and methodologies are appropriate for their programs and applicable Stage 1 requirements.
No profiles match your current filters or search.
All information provided within is preliminary and subject to change. Specific criteria and requirements are currently being refined. In the event of any inconsistency, the official SMART Antiviral Prize Terms & Conditions supersede this information.